Notice: Undefined index: HTTP_ACCEPT_LANGUAGE in /home/noritsu/www/wp/wp-content/themes/noritsukoki/functions.php on line 328
RESPONDING TO CLIMATE CHANGE (DISCLOSURE IN LINE WITH THE TCFD RECOMMENDATIONS) - ノーリツ鋼機

RESPONDING TO CLIMATE CHANGE(DISCLOSURE IN LINE WITH THE TCFD RECOMMENDATIONS)

Supporting the Adoption and Implementation of the TCFD Recommendations

The Noritsu Koki Group believes responding to climate change should be one of its key corporate issues (materialities) and expressed its support for the TCFD (Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures) recommendations in October, 2022. Guided by the recommendations, we, in the Group, will identify the potential business implications of climate-related risks and opportunities and reflect them in our business strategy. We continue to commit to information disclosure and ensuring the realisation of a sustainable society as well as the Group’s sustainable growth.

Governance

Role of the Board in Monitoring System

The Group’s Sustainability Promotion Committee, chaired by the Representative Director and CEO of Noritsu Koki, undertakes deliberations of important sustainability issues including climate change responses. They also provide reports and recommendations to the Board at least on a quarterly basis, thereby ensuring an appropriate monitoring system. The Board undertakes deliberations and makes decisions on reported important climate related risks and opportunities, as well as directing the responses and oversight of the progress.

Prior to the deliberations of the Sustainability Promotion Committee, important sustainability issues are first discussed in Sustainability Promotion Meetings, supported by the Company’s executive officer. In the meetings, they share performance results of climate change responses taken across the Group’s operations and track progress against the Group’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target.

Roles in Climate Change Responses
Roles Committee Members
Board of Directors
  • ・Discussing and making decisions on important climate-related risks and opportunities
  • ・Providing direction and overseeing progress
  • ・Overseeing the effectiveness of the Sustainability Promotion Committee’s risk management process and overall progress
Sustainability Promotion Committee
  • ・Assessing and analysing climate-related risks and opportunities. Identifying important climate-related risks and opportunities. Developing policies and response measures to mitigate against these risks and exploit opportunities
  • ・Reporting the above and presenting recommendations to the Board
Risk Management Committee
  • ・Sharing information about these climate-related risks. Looking into the need for further actions as appropriate
Sustainability Promotion Meetings
  • ・Discussing climate-related risks and opportunities
  • ・Sharing performance results of climate change responses taken across the Group’s operations and tracking progress against the Group’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target

Risk Management

Risk Assessment, Identification and Management Process

The Sustainability Promotion Committee assesses, analyses and identifies climate-related risks and opportunities that may significantly impact on the Group and its business. The Committee develops policies and response measures to mitigate against these risks and exploit opportunities and presents reports and recommendations to the Board. The Board oversees the effectiveness of the risk management process and overall progress.

The Risk Management Committee manages overall risks across the entire Group. It shares information about the said risks with the Sustainability Promotion Committee and looks into the need for further actions as appropriate.

Strategy

Scenario Analyses

To strengthen the Group’s resilience, respond to risks and opportunities that may impact business and develop new strategies, we performed scenario analyses. We used the 1.5℃–2℃ scenario and the 4℃ scenario as presented by organizations such as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the International Energy Agency (IEA). In the scenario analyses we identified two types of risks: transition risks, which are related to tightening of policies and regulations with the transition to a decarbonized society, and physical risks, which are associated with the increasing severity of abnormal weather events and a rise in average temperatures. Based on quantitative analyses, we assessed the possible financial impact by 2030.

Noritsu Koki recognizes the potential for climate change issues to have a significant impact on the Group’s businesses, strategies and financial plans. We therefore regularly assess risks and opportunities and revise our strategies.

Our Responses to Climate-related Risks and Opportunities
Adopted Scenarios
1.5℃ scenario
IEA NZE (Net Zero Emissions by 2050)
2℃ scenario
IPCC Rcp2.6
4℃ scenario
IEA STEPS (Stated Policy Scenario)
IPCC SSP5-8.5
Metrics
Timeframe
Up to 2030
Financial impact
Small (less than ¥500 million) / Medium (from ¥500 million to less than ¥3 billion) / Large (¥3 billion or more)
Risks & Opportunities
Risk type Scenario
Financial
Impact
Group’s Response
TRANSITIONRISK
Policy and regulations
Risk
  • ・Increase in costs related to GHG emissions in the Group’s manufacturing and business activities due to introduction of a carbon tax and emissions trading
Small
  • ・Medium- to long-term reduction in GHG emissions (increase rate of renewable energy usage, introduce energy-saving equipment, implement energy-saving measures, streamline production process, promote technology innovation, etc.)
  • ・Promotion of emissions reduction in cooperation with suppliers
Risk
  • ・Increase in electricity costs due to accelerated shift to renewable energy and resulting higher use of such energy
Small
Risk
  • ・Increase in investment costs resulting from requests to convert to highly energy efficient equipment driven by measures to promote energy saving
Small
Technology
Risk
  • ・Increase in transportation expenses as higher costs are passed through to prices with the progressive introduction of low-carbon technologies by logistics companies
Medium
  • ・Promotion of modal shift, giving consideration to profitability
Market
Risk
  • ・Decline in business opportunities if environmental initiatives become necessary throughout the supply chain due to the promotion of ethical consumption, and if our efforts are seen as not proactive enough
Medium
  • ・Supply of environmentally responsible products (reduction in resources used for products and packaging, shift to energy-saving products with longer lifespans, use of reusable and recyclable materials, creation of product recycling systems, etc.)
  • ・Promotion of environmental initiatives in cooperation with suppliers
Opportunity
  • ・Increase in business opportunities if environmental initiatives become necessary throughout the supply chain due to the promotion of ethical consumption, and if our efforts are seen as proactive
Medium
Reputation
Opportunity
  • ・Increase in stock price and decline in capital procurement costs as investor trust rises due to positive evaluation of our environmental consideration and BCP initiatives
Small
  • ・Enhancement of climate change initiatives and disclosure, as well as dialogue
PHYSICALRISK
Acute
Risk
  • ・Increase in costs incurred for responding to suspension of operations and logistics functions due to major impact on production sites and supply chains as increasingly severe abnormal weather causes an increase in flooding and storm surge damage at sites
Small
  • ・Development of a business continuity plan (BCP) that includes the supply chain
  • ・Diversify suppliers
  • ・Relocation and decentralization of warehouses
  • ・Stronger flood measures
Chronic
Risk
  • ・Increase in refrigeration costs due to chronic temperature rise
Small
  • ・Utilizing more energy-efficient air conditioning facilities
  • Note: For acute physical risks, we assessed domestic Group sites using hazard maps, flood control economic survey manuals and other tools. Under the 4℃ scenario, one site would be at risk for business suspension and asset losses due to disasters. Given the recurrence period, however, the annual impact is low. We have therefore classified the impact as “small.” Going forward, we will continue to evaluate the impact, including at contract manufacturer sites.

Metrics and Targets

To measure and manage the potential business impact of climate change, using Scope 1* and Scope 2* GHG emissions as our metrics, we have set a target of a 42% reduction by 2030 compared with 2023 (target revised in Sep. 2024). We have reviewed our target to make it aligned with the Science Based Targets initiative’s 1.5℃ scenario. In addition, in 2023 we have started calculating Scope 3* emissions (disclosed in CDP Response 2024) . We will continue considering ways to reduce GHG emissions throughout our entire supply chain.

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
(Unit:t-CO2)
Results Targets
FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 FY2022 FY2023 FY2030
Scope1・2 11,923 10,325 12,020 12,208 12,191 7,071
  • Please visit here for the Reporting Criteria for 2023 GHG Emission (Scope 1 and 2) in the Integrated Report 2024
  • * Emissions for years up to and including 2022 have been restated due to a revision of emission factors and inclusion of gasoline usage in the calculation.
  • * Emissions for 2023 have been restated due to a revision of emission factors and inclusion of energy-related CH4, N2O and other non-energy-related GHGs in the calculation.
  • * The Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions for 2023 disclosed in the Integrated Report 2024 have been assured by the third party organization.
    Please refer to page 35, 57 and 58 of the Integrated Report 2024.
  • Scope 1:
    Direct emissions from a company’s business (fuel consumption, industrial processes, etc.)
    Scope 2:
    Indirect energy-related emissions from electric power and other energy consumed by a company
    Scope 3:
    Indirect emissions other than Scope1 and Scope 2 (emissions by others in the upstream and downstream of a company’s activities)